Kuznar v. Raksha Corporation
This text of 729 N.W.2d 519 (Kuznar v. Raksha Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judith KUZNAR and Joseph Kuznar, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
RAKSHA CORPORATION, d/b/a Crown Pharmacy, and Valerie Randall, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 22, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed whether a pharmacy is a "licensed health facility" under MCL 600.5838a, and whether, in light of MCL 333.17741, the pharmacist is a necessary party to a claim against a pharmacy for dispensing the wrong drug. Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
729 N.W.2d 519, 477 Mich. 1097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuznar-v-raksha-corporation-mich-2007.