Kuyper v. Witteman
This text of 23 F. 871 (Kuyper v. Witteman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The demurrer in this case is without merits. The complainants, upon the facts shown in the bill of complaint, have a good title to their trade-mark, and a case for its protection irrespective of their statutory rights under the, registration in the patent-office. As the necessary diversity of citizenship exists between the parties, they are entitled to invoke the jurisdiction of this court.
Opon the allegations of the bill the defendants are actively engaged in assisting third persons to use the complainants’ trade-mark in violation of their fights. The mere act of printing and selling labels in imitation of the complainants’ might be innocent, and, without evi[872]*872dence of an illicit purpose, would not be a violation of the complainants’ rights. It is otherwise, however, when this is done with the obvious purpose of enabling others by the use of the labels to palm off their goods upon the public as the goods of the complainants.
The demurrer is overruled, with costs. Defendants may answer upon payment of costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 F. 871, 1885 U.S. App. LEXIS 2004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuyper-v-witteman-circtsdny-1885.