Kutsch v. Maass

837 P.2d 563, 115 Or. App. 380, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1761
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 30, 1992
Docket90-C-10741; CA A73776
StatusPublished

This text of 837 P.2d 563 (Kutsch v. Maass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kutsch v. Maass, 837 P.2d 563, 115 Or. App. 380, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1761 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The state concedes that the trial court erred in dismissing petitioner’s petition for post-conviction relief on the ground that it was barred by ORS 138.510(2), as amended by Or Laws 1989, ch 1053, § 18. The convictions that petitioner challenges became final before the effective date of the 1989 amendment. The amendment does not apply to a petition challenging a conviction that became final before the effective date of the amendment. Boone v. Wright, 314 Or 135, 836 P2d 727 (1992).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boone v. Wright
836 P.2d 727 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
837 P.2d 563, 115 Or. App. 380, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kutsch-v-maass-orctapp-1992.