Kutsch v. Maass
This text of 837 P.2d 563 (Kutsch v. Maass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The state concedes that the trial court erred in dismissing petitioner’s petition for post-conviction relief on the ground that it was barred by ORS 138.510(2), as amended by Or Laws 1989, ch 1053, § 18. The convictions that petitioner challenges became final before the effective date of the 1989 amendment. The amendment does not apply to a petition challenging a conviction that became final before the effective date of the amendment. Boone v. Wright, 314 Or 135, 836 P2d 727 (1992).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
837 P.2d 563, 115 Or. App. 380, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kutsch-v-maass-orctapp-1992.