Kutler v. Jowers

280 A.D.2d 585, 720 N.Y.S.2d 810, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1635

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated June 8, 2000, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant’s motion papers failed to establish a prima facie case that the plaintiffs injuries were not serious within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Chaplin v Taylor, 273 AD2d 188; Flanagan v Hoeg, 212 AD2d 756, 757; Mendola v Demetres, 212 AD2d 515). Bracken, Acting P. J., S. Miller, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kutler v. Jowers, 280 A.D.2d 585, 720 N.Y.S.2d 810, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

280 A.D.2d 585 (Kutler v. Jowers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mendola v. Demetres
212 A.D.2d 515 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Flanagan v. Hoeg
212 A.D.2d 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Chaplin v. Taylor
273 A.D.2d 188 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)