Kuta v. Kaminsky

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kuta v. Kaminsky

363 S.W.3d 134, 2012 WL 123279, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 46

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 17, 2012

DocketED 96724

StatusPublished

This text of 363 S.W.3d 134 (Kuta v. Kaminsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kuta v. Kaminsky, 363 S.W.3d 134, 2012 WL 123279, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 46 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Randall Kuta, doing business as Life-tyme Exteriors, (“Plaintiff’) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, directing a verdict in favor of defendants Sheri Kamin-sky, Oscar Hantz, and Don Anderson, doing business as Anderson Building Co., and against Plaintiff on Plaintiffs Petition for Damages. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Randall Kuta, doing business as Life-tyme Exteriors, (“Plaintiff’) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, directing a verdict in favor of defendants Sheri Kamin-sky, Oscar Hantz, and Don Anderson, doing business as Anderson Building Co., and against Plaintiff on Plaintiffs Petition for Damages. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

363 S.W.3d 134, 2012 WL 123279, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuta-v-kaminsky-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack