Kuta v. Kaminsky

363 S.W.3d 134, 2012 WL 123279, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 46
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 17, 2012·No. ED 96724·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Randall Kuta, doing business as Life-tyme Exteriors, (“Plaintiff’) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, directing a verdict in favor of defendants Sheri Kamin-sky, Oscar Hantz, and Don Anderson, doing business as Anderson Building Co., and against Plaintiff on Plaintiffs Petition for Damages. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kuta v. Kaminsky, 363 S.W.3d 134, 2012 WL 123279, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 46 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

363 S.W.3d 134 (Kuta v. Kaminsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reed v. McDONALDS CORPORATION
363 S.W.3d 134 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)