Kusz v. New York City Transit Authority

88 A.D.3d 768, 930 N.Y.2d 892
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 11, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 88 A.D.3d 768 (Kusz v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kusz v. New York City Transit Authority, 88 A.D.3d 768, 930 N.Y.2d 892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The plaintiff Alfreda Kusz (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) was crossing Jackson Avenue in Queens County when she was struck by a New York City bus driven by the defendant Jose Mateo (hereinafter the defendant driver). The plaintiffs established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability against the defendants by demonstrating that the defendant driver failed to yield the right-of-way to the injured plaintiff, who was crossing the street within the crosswalk with the pedestrian crossing signal in her favor, after looking both ways (see Benedikt v Certified Lbr. Corp., 60 AD3d 798 [2009]; Rosenblatt v Venizelos, 49 AD3d 519 [2008]).

In opposition, the defendants raised a triable issue of fact regarding the injured plaintiffs comparative negligence. Accordingly, the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability was properly denied without prejudice to renewal after the completion of discovery {see CFLR 3212 [f]). Dillon, J.E, Leventhal, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ustelimova v. Madar
2018 NY Slip Op 2164 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Dunajski v. Kirillov
2017 NY Slip Op 2020 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Gomez v. Novak
140 A.D.3d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Twarog v. Ortiz-Deviteri
137 A.D.3d 777 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Zhu v. Natale
131 A.D.3d 607 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Tsang v. New York City Transit Authority
125 A.D.3d 648 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Stanfield v. O & B Hacking Corp.
124 A.D.3d 869 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Brown v. Mackiewicz
120 A.D.3d 1172 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Ali v. Verizon New York, Inc.
116 A.D.3d 722 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Moreira v. M.K. Travel & Transport, Inc.
106 A.D.3d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Shenkerman v. Goycoechea
34 Misc. 3d 496 (New York Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 A.D.3d 768, 930 N.Y.2d 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kusz-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-2011.