Kustin v. Cohen, Norris, Scherer, Weinberger & Wolmer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kustin v. Cohen, Norris, Scherer, Weinberger & Wolmer

18 So. 3d 730, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15527, 2009 WL 3271340

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 14, 2009·No. 4D09-1109·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from a non-final order denying the appellant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We find that the factual disputes in the various *731 affidavits submitted by the parties cannot be reconciled. Accordingly, we reverse the order of the trial court and remand with directions that the trial court conduct an evidentiary hearing on the issue of personal jurisdiction over the appellant. See Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499, 503 (Fla.1989).

FARMER, HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from a non-final order denying the appellant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We find that the factual disputes in the various *731 affidavits submitted by the parties cannot be reconciled. Accordingly, we reverse the order of the trial court and remand with directions that the trial court conduct an evidentiary hearing on the issue of personal jurisdiction over the appellant. See Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499, 503 (Fla.1989).

FARMER, HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Kustin v. Cohen, Norris, Scherer, Weinberger & Wolmer, 18 So. 3d 730, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15527, 2009 WL 3271340 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

18 So. 3d 730 (Kustin v. Cohen, Norris, Scherer, Weinberger & Wolmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related