Kustas Brothers, Inc. v. Bee Gee Distributing Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kustas Brothers, Inc. v. Bee Gee Distributing Corp.

18 A.D.2d 705, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6270

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 24, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 705 (Kustas Brothers, Inc. v. Bee Gee Distributing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kustas Brothers, Inc. v. Bee Gee Distributing Corp., 18 A.D.2d 705, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6270 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Jn an action by plaintiff to recover damages for [706]*706loss of its profitable business relationships resulting from an alleged conspiracy among the defendants to wrongfully undermine such relationships, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Columbia County, made July 26, 1962 and entered in Dutchess County on July 27, 1962, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint for patent insufficiency (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Defendants’ time to answer the complaint is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Beldoek, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jn an action by plaintiff to recover damages for [706]*706loss of its profitable business relationships resulting from an alleged conspiracy among the defendants to wrongfully undermine such relationships, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Columbia County, made July 26, 1962 and entered in Dutchess County on July 27, 1962, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint for patent insufficiency (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Defendants’ time to answer the complaint is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Beldoek, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 705, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kustas-brothers-inc-v-bee-gee-distributing-corp-nyappdiv-1962.