Kuskin v. Guttman
132 A. 922, 99 N.J. Eq. 887, 14 Stock. 887, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 510
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kuskin v. Guttman, 132 A. 922, 99 N.J. Eq. 887, 14 Stock. 887, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 510 (N.J. 1926).
132 A. 922 (Kuskin v. Guttman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maihack v. Mehl
57 A.2d 44 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
N.J. Title Guarantee Trust Co. v. Berliner
40 A.2d 790 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
Christiansen v. Local 680, Milk Drivers, C.
10 A.2d 168 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1940)
Acquackanonk Bldg., C., Passaic v. Parsonnet
151 A. 865 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1930)
Levine v. Lafayette Building Corp.
142 A. 441 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1928)
Morgan Realty Co. v. Pazen
139 A. 712 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)