Kurzet v. Dept. of Rev.
This text of Kurzet v. Dept. of Rev. (Kurzet v. Dept. of Rev.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed: October 28, 1999
CHESTER S. KURZET and LOUISE JAYNE,
Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
State of Oregon,
Respondent.
On appeal from the Oregon Tax Court.
Argued and submitted October 14, 1999.
Louise Jayne, Portland, appellant pro se, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellants.
Jerry Bronner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Hardy Myers, Attorney General.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, Leeson, and Riggs, Justices.*
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The judgment of the Oregon Tax Court is affirmed. ORS 305.765; Atkins v. Dept. of Rev., 320 Or 713, 894 P2d 449 (1995), cert den 516 US 1042 (1996).
*Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kurzet v. Dept. of Rev., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurzet-v-dept-of-rev-or-1999.