Kurz v. United States
This text of 34 Cust. Ct. 337 (Kurz v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of aluminum or duraluminum scrap in sheets or strips and that it is a nonferrous metal scrap, not ores nor concentrates, nor virgin nor crude metal; that said scrap was imported to be used in remanufacture by melting; that, after importation, it was melted and manufactured into aluminum ingots; and that there had been compliance with the regulations of the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Public Law 869, supra. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Cust. Ct. 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurz-v-united-states-cusc-1955.