Kurz v. Nicolo

120 A.D.2d 959, 502 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57054
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kurz v. Nicolo. Read the opinion of the Court — 125 A.D.2d 993

Opinion

— Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons stated in the memorandum decision at Special Term (Willis, J.). We add only that plaintiff, in opposition to the motion for summary judgment, failed to submit proof in admissible form showing that the alleged slanderous remarks were in fact spoken by defendant. (Appeal from order and judgment of Supreme Court, Yates County, Willis, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Balio and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kurz v. Nicolo, 120 A.D.2d 959, 502 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57054 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

120 A.D.2d 959 (Kurz v. Nicolo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.