Kurz & Uren, Inc. v. Place

181 A.D. 955

This text of 181 A.D. 955 (Kurz & Uren, Inc. v. Place) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kurz & Uren, Inc. v. Place, 181 A.D. 955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

This court finds as a fact upon the record that defendant John W. Place held the legal title to the property in question for the benefit of, and as dummy for, one J. Leo O’Brien; that the conveyance by said defendant Place to the defendant Golane Publishing Company was made at the request of said O’Brien and in discharge of a moral obligation so to convey, and that the conveyance was not made with intent to hinder, delay or defraud the creditors of said defendant Place. Judgment affirmed, without costs. [956]*956Mills, Rich and Blackmar, JJ., concurred; Thomas, J., dissented on the ground that both in law and equity Place had an indefeasible title and that the conveyance by Place to the defendant Golane Publishing Company was fraudulent as against plaintiff’s creditors. If there were a judgment lien by Place’s creditors, Place’s discharge of a moral duty by making conveyance would not override the lien. But the creditors are entitled against an insolvent debtor to what they could subject to his judgment if a voluntary conveyance thereof had not been made. Stapleton, J., concurred with Thomas, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 A.D. 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurz-uren-inc-v-place-nyappdiv-1917.