Kurylov v. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

139 A.D.3d 451, 31 N.Y.S.3d 56
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 5, 2016
Docket825 162005/14
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 139 A.D.3d 451 (Kurylov v. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kurylov v. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 139 A.D.3d 451, 31 N.Y.S.3d 56 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered October 8, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants’ (Mount Sinai) motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (c), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, a black woman from Nigeria, alleges that she was terminated from Mount Sinai’s residency program in pathology because of her race and/or national origin. Mount Sinai brought a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211, seeking, alternatively, that the court convert the motion to one for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3211 (c). The motion court expressly declined to treat the motion as one for summary judgment. Consequently, no notice of any conversion was given, precluding our deciding this appeal under the summary judgment standard (see Brathwaite v Frankel, 98 AD3d 444 [1st Dept 2012]). This case does not pose any exception to the notice requirement under CPLR 3211 (c), because the questions raised about whether plaintiff has any evidence of discrimination, are not solely ones of law or statutory interpretation. Nor did *452 plaintiff ever indicate that she joined in deliberately charting a summary judgment course (see Braithwaite at 444-445; see Spilka v Town of Inlet, 8 AD3d 812 [3d Dept 2004]). Viewing plaintiffs complaint under the liberal standard afforded to the pleader under CPLR 3211, we find that the complaint states a cause of action. We do not reach the merits of whether defendant is entitled to summary judgment.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Moskowitz, Gische and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adeniji v. City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 34232(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 A.D.3d 451, 31 N.Y.S.3d 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurylov-v-icahn-school-of-medicine-at-mount-sinai-nyappdiv-2016.