Kurtz v. William B. Riker & Son Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Kurtz v. William B. Riker & Son Co.

130 N.Y.S. 1117

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 130 N.Y.S. 1117 (Kurtz v. William B. Riker & Son Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kurtz v. William B. Riker & Son Co., 130 N.Y.S. 1117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER OUR1AM.

We have examined the grounds urged by the appellant for the reversal of this judgment and are satisfied that they are without merit The evidence adduced did not, however, in our opinion, justify the amount of damages which the court awarded plaintiff. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, unless the respondent, in 10 days after the entry of the order upon this judgment, stipulates to reduce the judgment to $100 and appropriate costs in the court below, in which event the judgment, as modified, is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER OUR1AM.

We have examined the grounds urged by the appellant for the reversal of this judgment and are satisfied that they are without merit The evidence adduced did not, however, in our opinion, justify the amount of damages which the court awarded plaintiff. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, unless the respondent, in 10 days after the entry of the order upon this judgment, stipulates to reduce the judgment to $100 and appropriate costs in the court below, in which event the judgment, as modified, is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 N.Y.S. 1117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurtz-v-william-b-riker-son-co-nyappterm-1911.