Kurtz v. Potter
167 N.Y. 586
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Pabkeb, Ch. J., Geay, Babtlett, Haight, Mastín, Yann and Webneb, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kurtz v. Potter, 167 N.Y. 586 (N.Y. 1901).
167 N.Y. 586 (Kurtz v. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Texas Co. v. Melfi
263 A.D. 537 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
Cromwell v. American Bible Society
202 A.D. 625 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)
Baumert v. . Malkin
139 N.E. 210 (New York Court of Appeals, 1922)
Baumert v. Malkin
189 A.D. 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)
Booth v. . Knipe
122 N.E. 202 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)
Booth v. Knipe
178 A.D. 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
Reed v. Sobel
177 A.D. 532 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
Altman v. McMillin
115 A.D. 234 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)