Kurtz v. Kurtz
22 Ark. 226
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
In this case, as in Ford vs. Ford, decided at the present term, the plea of limitations' of three years was put in to a declaration in trover, which was stricken out by the court, on motion of the plaintiff. Following the decision named, we hold that the court erred, and reverse its judgment, with instructions to overrule the motion to strike out the second plea of the defendant below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kurtz v. Kurtz, 22 Ark. 226 (Ark. 1860).
22 Ark. 226 (Kurtz v. Kurtz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomas v. Westbrook
177 S.W.2d 931 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1944)