Kurtz v. Kurtz

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Kurtz v. Kurtz

22 Ark. 226

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedOctober 15, 1860

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 Ark. 226 (Kurtz v. Kurtz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kurtz v. Kurtz, 22 Ark. 226 (Ark. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Fairchild,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case, as in Ford vs. Ford, decided at the present term, the plea of limitations' of three years was put in to a declaration in trover, which was stricken out by the court, on motion of the plaintiff. Following the decision named, we hold that the court erred, and reverse its judgment, with instructions to overrule the motion to strike out the second plea of the defendant below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Fairchild,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case, as in Ford vs. Ford, decided at the present term, the plea of limitations' of three years was put in to a declaration in trover, which was stricken out by the court, on motion of the plaintiff. Following the decision named, we hold that the court erred, and reverse its judgment, with instructions to overrule the motion to strike out the second plea of the defendant below.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 Ark. 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurtz-v-kurtz-ark-1860.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack