Kurtz v. Hollingshead's Heirs
14 F. Cas. 882, 3 D.C. 68, 3 Cranch 68
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 15, 1826
StatusPublished
This text of 14 F. Cas. 882 (Kurtz v. Hollingshead's Heirs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kurtz v. Hollingshead's Heirs, 14 F. Cas. 882, 3 D.C. 68, 3 Cranch 68 (circtddc 1826).
Opinion
The complainants are now seeking, in equity, to establish a legal priority. “ Equity is equality.” The equity of the other creditors is equal to that of the bank, and the bank has lost its legal priority. I think the bill must- be dismissed, but without costs, as the deeds have been lost since the bill was filed.
Bill dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
14 F. Cas. 882, 3 D.C. 68, 3 Cranch 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurtz-v-hollingsheads-heirs-circtddc-1826.