Home/Eighth Circuit/Kurtz v. English

Kurtz v. English

5 F.2d 1016, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2836
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 9, 1925
DocketNo. 6926
StatusPublished

This text of 5 F.2d 1016 (Kurtz v. English) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kurtz v. English, 5 F.2d 1016, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2836 (8th Cir. 1925).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal docketed and dis-. missed, with costs, on motion of appellees, under rule 16.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 F.2d 1016, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurtz-v-english-ca8-1925.