Kurtz v. Campbell
67 A. 843, 218 Pa. 524, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 564
Opinion
This case is clearly within the rule of York Trust, etc., Co. v. Gallatin, 186 Pa. 150. The majority of the court are of opinion, that on principle that case was erroneously decided, but as it has stood in the books for nine years, and many contracts have been made in reliance on it, the principle of stare decisis should prevail, and the authority of that decision should not now be disturbed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kurtz v. Campbell, 67 A. 843, 218 Pa. 524, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 564 (Pa. 1907).
67 A. 843 (Kurtz v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wetmore Case
32 A.2d 221 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Black's Estate
19 A.2d 130 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Homer Building & Loan Ass'n v. S. Makransky & Sons, Inc.
190 A. 179 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Auto Building & Loan Ass'n v. Hall
177 A. 581 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
Crawford v. New Spartan Building & Loan Ass'n
170 A. 695 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Sullivan & Sons Manufacturing Co. v. Ideal Building & Loan Ass'n
170 A. 263 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Cameron v. Riggle
14 Pa. D. & C. 547 (Beaver County Court of Common Pleas, 1930)
Savitz Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Lissman
101 Pa. Super. 501 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Orient Building & Loan Ass'n v. Freud
148 A. 841 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Consolidated Building & Loan Ass'n v. Shipley
95 Pa. Super. 232 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Consolid'd B. L. Assn. v. Shipley
95 Pa. Super. 232 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
R. C. Clement Building Ass'n v. Ortenz
11 Pa. D. & C. 215 (Philadelphia County Municipal Court, 1928)
Haspel v. McLaughlin-Lyons
38 Pa. Super. 334 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)