Kurtz v. Bubeck
39 Pa. Super. 370, 1909 Pa. Super. LEXIS 495
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 21, 1909
DocketAppeal, No. 7
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases
This text of 39 Pa. Super. 370 (Kurtz v. Bubeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kurtz v. Bubeck, 39 Pa. Super. 370, 1909 Pa. Super. LEXIS 495 (Pa. Ct. App. 1909).
Opinion
The decree is affirmed at the costs of William Elwood, the appellant, upon the findings of facts, conclusions of law and opinion filed by the learned judge below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Benjamin Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Superb Realty Co.
53 Pa. D. & C. 186 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1944)
Homeseekers Building Association Case
15 A.2d 350 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Yonah Building & Loan Ass'n Case
3 A.2d 49 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Braverman v. Edgmont B. & L. Ass'n
33 Pa. D. & C. 547 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1938)
Henry Heymann Building & Loan Ass'n v. Denney
196 A. 872 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
West Susquehanna Building & Loan Ass'n v. Sinclair
188 A. 371 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Harr v. Hirsh-Luria Building & Loan Ass'n
26 Pa. D. & C. 643 (Berks County Court of Common Pleas, 1936)
Blanarik v. Slavic Progressive Beneficial Union
187 A. 272 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Gorges v. Greater Adelphi Building & Loan Ass'n
182 A. 804 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Morris Resnick B. & L. Ass'n v. Barnes
164 A. 358 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Wertheimer v. Morris Haber Building & Loan Ass'n
17 Pa. D. & C. 683 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1932)
Stone v. New Schiller B. & L. Ass'n
165 A. 12 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Sperling v. Euclid B. & L. Ass'n
162 A. 201 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Friedman v. Southern Co-Operative B. & L. Assn.
159 A. 80 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Stone v. Schiller Building & Loan Ass'n
153 A. 758 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Allman v. David Berg B. & L. Ass'n
100 Pa. Super. 205 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Borowsky v. Charles Steiner Building & Loan Ass'n
13 Pa. D. & C. 651 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1930)
Catsiff v. Elanore Rothschild Building & Loan Ass'n
13 Pa. D. & C. 259 (Philadelphia County Municipal Court, 1930)
Katz v. David Fine Building & Loan Ass'n
13 Pa. D. & C. 217 (Philadelphia County Municipal Court, 1930)
Kurtz v. Farrell
44 Pa. Super. 355 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1910)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
39 Pa. Super. 370, 1909 Pa. Super. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurtz-v-bubeck-pasuperct-1909.