KURTZ, GINGER v. POIRIER, JOHN J.
This text of KURTZ, GINGER v. POIRIER, JOHN J. (KURTZ, GINGER v. POIRIER, JOHN J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
502 CA 14-01685 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
GINGER KURTZ, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF SAMANTHA MANDARINO, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
V ORDER
JOHN J. POIRIER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
ROBERT E. LAHM, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JOEL FEROLETO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
BARTH SULLIVAN BEHR, SYRACUSE (LAURENCE D. BEHR OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (James P. Murphy, J.), entered April 10, 2014. The order denied the motion of plaintiff to set aside a jury verdict and upheld and affirmed the verdict of no cause of action.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]).
Entered: May 8, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
KURTZ, GINGER v. POIRIER, JOHN J., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurtz-ginger-v-poirier-john-j-nyappdiv-2015.