Kurtz Ex Rel. Gillman v. Lakes Medi Van, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Kurtz Ex Rel. Gillman v. Lakes Medi Van, Inc.

720 N.W.2d 590, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 591, 2006 WL 2506959

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided August 23, 2006·No. A06-952·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 25, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that, “summary af-firmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 25, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that, “summary af-firmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Kurtz Ex Rel. Gillman v. Lakes Medi Van, Inc., 720 N.W.2d 590, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 591, 2006 WL 2506959 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

720 N.W.2d 590 (Kurtz Ex Rel. Gillman v. Lakes Medi Van, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related