Kurtis Hoechstetter v. Pickens County, Georgia
This text of Kurtis Hoechstetter v. Pickens County, Georgia (Kurtis Hoechstetter v. Pickens County, Georgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SECOND DIVISION MILLER, P. J., DOYLE, P. J., and REESE, J.
NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules
March 1, 2019
In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A17A0565. HOECHSTETTER et al. v. PICKENS COUNTY et al.
MILLER, Presiding Judge.
In Hoechstetter v. Pickens County, 341 Ga. App. 213 (799 SE2d 352) (2017),
we affirmed the denial of summary judgment to the appellants, concluding that they
had received sufficient notice of a hearing on a zoning board’s decision. In
Hoechstetter v. Pickens County, 303 Ga. 786 (815 SE2d 50) (2018), the Supreme
Court of Georgia reversed our decision. We therefore vacate our decision in
Hoechstetter, supra, 341 Ga. App. 213, and adopt the judgment of the Supreme Court
as the opinion of this Court.
Judgment reversed. Doyle, P. J., and Reese, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kurtis Hoechstetter v. Pickens County, Georgia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurtis-hoechstetter-v-pickens-county-georgia-gactapp-2019.