Kurtell & Co. v. Miami Tribune, Inc.

193 So. 2d 471
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 10, 1967·No. No. 66-304·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants, who were the -plaintiffs in the trial court, appeal a final judgment dismissing their complaint claiming actionable libel by the appellee. Attached to the complaint is a copy of the article claimed to be libelous. The trial judge determined from an examination of the article that the conclusion of law contained in appellants’ complaint that the article contained defamatory statements and inferences was not supported by the exhibit. The fact that plaintiffs may not like the way the article was written or what it says about them does not automatically provide the basis for a libel suit. See Mann v. Roosevelt Shop, Inc., Fla. 1949, 41 So.2d 894.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kurtell & Co. v. Miami Tribune, Inc., 193 So. 2d 471 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

193 So. 2d 471 (Kurtell & Co. v. Miami Tribune, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sardinas v. M.C.A., Inc.
484 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Victor v. News & Sun-sentinel Co.
6 Fla. Supp. 2d 132 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1984)