Kurtell & Co. v. Miami Tribune, Inc.

193 So. 2d 471
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 10, 1967
DocketNo. 66-304
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 193 So. 2d 471 (Kurtell & Co. v. Miami Tribune, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kurtell & Co. v. Miami Tribune, Inc., 193 So. 2d 471 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants, who were the -plaintiffs in the trial court, appeal a final judgment dismissing their complaint claiming actionable libel by the appellee. Attached to the complaint is a copy of the article claimed to be libelous. The trial judge determined from an examination of the article that the conclusion of law contained in appellants’ complaint that the article contained defamatory statements and inferences was not supported by the exhibit. The fact that plaintiffs may not like the way the article was written or what it says about them does not automatically provide the basis for a libel suit. See Mann v. Roosevelt Shop, Inc., Fla. 1949, 41 So.2d 894.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sardinas v. M.C.A., Inc.
484 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Victor v. News & Sun-sentinel Co.
6 Fla. Supp. 2d 132 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 So. 2d 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurtell-co-v-miami-tribune-inc-fladistctapp-1967.