KURT SHANNON v. HILLSBOROUGH AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 28, 2018·No. 17-1086·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

KURT SHANNON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1086 ) HILLSBOROUGH AREA REGIONAL ) TRANSIT, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed September 28, 2018.

Appeal from the Commission on Human Relations.

Kurt Shannon, pro se.

Michael H. Bowling and John M. Janousek of Bell & Roper, Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KURT SHANNON v. HILLSBOROUGH AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

KURT SHANNON v. HILLSBOROUGH AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT (KURT SHANNON v. HILLSBOROUGH AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.