Kurt Orban Co. v. United States

54 Cust. Ct. 624, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2485
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 20, 1965
DocketReap. Dec. 10956; Entry No. 9883
StatusPublished

This text of 54 Cust. Ct. 624 (Kurt Orban Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kurt Orban Co. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 624, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2485 (cusc 1965).

Opinion

Wilson, Judge:

The following appeal for reappraisement is before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

[625]*625IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by counsel for the parties hereto:
That the merchandise covered by the appeal to reappraisement enumerated above consists of wire strand exported from Japan during the period beginning February 16, 1960 and ending Jaunary 28, 1962; that wire strand is not identified in the Pinal List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; that on or immediately preceding the date of exportation of each shipment of wire strand covered by the appeal to reappraisement enumerated above, the price at which wire strand, such as or similar to the wire strand described on the invoices covered by the instant appeal to reappraisement was freely sold, or in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal market of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was $245 per metric ton for wire strand of % inch diameter (United States funds).
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal to reappraisement enumerated above is submitted for decision upon this stipulation and the entry file covered by said appeal.

The stipulated facts establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise, included on the invoice covered by the entry involved herein, is statutory export value and that such value is $245 per metric ton for wire strand of %-inch diameter (United States funds), and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 Cust. Ct. 624, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurt-orban-co-v-united-states-cusc-1965.