Kursheedt Mfg. Co. v. Naday
108 F. 918, 48 C.C.A. 140, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3839
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 24, 1901·No. Nos. 116, 117·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
The rule in this court for many years has been not to allow the sum paid for printing briefs or arguments as part of the taxable costs or disbursements, except when specially provided for by rule. In this respect the practice conforms, to that of the supreme court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kursheedt Mfg. Co. v. Naday, 108 F. 918, 48 C.C.A. 140, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3839 (2d Cir. 1901).
108 F. 918 (Kursheedt Mfg. Co. v. Naday) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Joseph Scaduto v. Anthony J. Orlando, D/B/A A. J. Orlando Contracting Co.
381 F.2d 587 (Second Circuit, 1967)
Bailey v. Mississippi Home Telephone Co.
254 F. 358 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1918)
United States v. Thlinket Packing Co.
6 Alaska 117 (D. Alaska, 1918)
Bond v. United Railroads
128 P. 786 (California Court of Appeal, 1912)