Kurshan v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kurshan v. Robinson

243 A.D. 814

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 814 (Kurshan v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kurshan v. Robinson, 243 A.D. 814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

■— Plamtiff brought an action in the Municipal Court to recover for personal injuries sustamed by her, a pedestrian, when the automobiles of defendants collided. The MuMeipal Court rendered judgment m her favor and against both defendants. Defendant National Transportation Co., Inc., appealed to the Appellate Term, which reversed the judgment and dismissed the eomplamt as against it. From the order of the Appellate Term the plaintiff appeals. Order of the Appellate Term reversed on the law and the facts and judgment of the [815]*815Municipal Court affirmed, with costs in all courts. In our opinion the verdict of the jury in plaintiff’s favor has ample support in the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

■— Plamtiff brought an action in the Municipal Court to recover for personal injuries sustamed by her, a pedestrian, when the automobiles of defendants collided. The MuMeipal Court rendered judgment m her favor and against both defendants. Defendant National Transportation Co., Inc., appealed to the Appellate Term, which reversed the judgment and dismissed the eomplamt as against it. From the order of the Appellate Term the plaintiff appeals. Order of the Appellate Term reversed on the law and the facts and judgment of the [815]*815Municipal Court affirmed, with costs in all courts. In our opinion the verdict of the jury in plaintiff’s favor has ample support in the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurshan-v-robinson-nyappdiv-1935.