Home/New Jersey Superior Court App Division/Kurowski v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bayonne

Kurowski v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bayonne

78 A.2d 429, 11 N.J. Super. 433
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedJanuary 17, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 78 A.2d 429 (Kurowski v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bayonne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kurowski v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bayonne, 78 A.2d 429, 11 N.J. Super. 433 (N.J. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

11 N.J. Super. 433 (1951)
78 A.2d 429

CASIMIR KUROWSKI AND LUCILLE KUROWSKI, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE, A CORPORATE BODY, AND MORRIS PADWE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 2, 1951.
Decided January 17, 1951.

*444 Before Judges FREUND, PROCTOR and ROGERS.

Mr. Stephen P. Piga argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Mr. William Rubin argued the cause for the defendant-respondent Board of Adjustment of the City of Bayonne.

Mr. A. Alfred Fink, attorney for defendant-respondent Morris Padwe.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Brennan in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. Bd. of Adjust., Bor. of Eatontown
299 A.2d 737 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1972)
Rexon v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, BOROUGH OF HADDONFIELD
89 A.2d 233 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 A.2d 429, 11 N.J. Super. 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurowski-v-bd-of-adjustment-of-bayonne-njsuperctappdiv-1951.