Kurowski v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bayonne
78 A.2d 429, 11 N.J. Super. 433
Opinion
CASIMIR KUROWSKI AND LUCILLE KUROWSKI, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE, A CORPORATE BODY, AND MORRIS PADWE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
*444 Before Judges FREUND, PROCTOR and ROGERS.
Mr. Stephen P. Piga argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants.
Mr. William Rubin argued the cause for the defendant-respondent Board of Adjustment of the City of Bayonne.
Mr. A. Alfred Fink, attorney for defendant-respondent Morris Padwe.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Brennan in the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kurowski v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bayonne, 78 A.2d 429, 11 N.J. Super. 433 (N.J. Ct. App. 1951).
78 A.2d 429 (Kurowski v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bayonne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hill v. Bd. of Adjust., Bor. of Eatontown
299 A.2d 737 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1972)
Rexon v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, BOROUGH OF HADDONFIELD
89 A.2d 233 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1952)