Kurlbaum v. Roepke
27 Mo. 161
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This suit was commenced after the code of 1855 was in force. The case was tried by the court, the parties having waived a jury. The present code does not require a finding of the facts when the issues in a cause are tried by the court. The old practice in such cases is now revived. When a cause is tried by the court sitting as a jury and no instructions or declarations of law are asked or given on the trial, this court will not interfere by ordering a new trial.
the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kurlbaum v. Roepke, 27 Mo. 161 (Mo. 1858).
27 Mo. 161 (Kurlbaum v. Roepke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wenzell v. Erath
48 Mo. App. 476 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)
Griffith v. Kansas City Material & Construction Co.
46 Mo. App. 539 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1891)
Tyler v. Larimore
19 Mo. App. 445 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1885)
Ford v. City of Cameron
19 Mo. App. 467 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1885)
Reese v. Cook
17 Mo. App. 512 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1885)
Waddell v. Williams
50 Mo. 216 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1872)
Judge v. Booge
47 Mo. 544 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1871)