Kurlansky & Paymer Ltd. v. Busbey
This text of 260 S.E.2d 26 (Kurlansky & Paymer Ltd. v. Busbey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from the grant of a motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendants in a suit for the specific performance of a contract for the purchase and sale of real estate. The facts are undisputed that no tender was made by the purchaser on or before the date required in the contract. The appellants contend that there was a genuine issue with respect to whether the appellees waived the necessity of tender on that date.
In our opinion, the appellees carried the burden on summary judgment by showing that they were available and ready to accept any tender offered on or before the required date.
The trial court did not err in granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 S.E.2d 26, 244 Ga. 312, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurlansky-paymer-ltd-v-busbey-ga-1979.