Kuriakose v. Gray

302 A.D.2d 434, 754 N.Y.S.2d 908

This text of 302 A.D.2d 434 (Kuriakose v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kuriakose v. Gray, 302 A.D.2d 434, 754 N.Y.S.2d 908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

In an action to enforce a confession of judgment, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered May 6, 2002, which denied his motion for a preliminary injunction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for a preliminary injunction (see Credit Agricole Indosuez v Rossiyskiy Kredit Bank, 94 NY2d 541; Campbell v Ernest, 19 NYS 123; see also Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v Alliance Bond Fund, 527 US 308).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Friedmann, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Credit Agricole Indosuez v. Rossiyskiy Kredit Bank
729 N.E.2d 683 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
Campbell v. Ernest
19 N.Y.S. 123 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 A.D.2d 434, 754 N.Y.S.2d 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuriakose-v-gray-nyappdiv-2003.