Kuri v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Kuri v. United States

25 Cust. Ct. 379, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 634

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedAugust 7, 1950

DocketNo. 7858; Entry No. 737812

StatusPublished

This text of 25 Cust. Ct. 379 (Kuri v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kuri v. United States, 25 Cust. Ct. 379, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 634 (cusc 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Lawbence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the merchandise the subject of this appeal are the same in all material respects as those decided in United States v. Gothic Watch Co., 23 Cust. Ct. 235, Reap. Dec. 7712, affirming the judgment in Gothic Watch Co. v. United States, 19 Cust. Ct. 309, Reap. Dec. 7438, and that the record in Reap. Dec. 7712, supra, may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that the attempted appraisement embodied in the second return of value by the appraiser of the merchandise covered by this appeal was illegal, null, and void, and that the appraiser’s original return of value, as reported by him to the collector of customs, constituted his appraisal of the merchandise pursuant to section 500 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1500), and was final and conclusive in the absence of any appeal pursuant to section 501 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1501).

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawbence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the merchandise the subject of this appeal are the same in all material respects as those decided in United States v. Gothic Watch Co., 23 Cust. Ct. 235, Reap. Dec. 7712, affirming the judgment in Gothic Watch Co. v. United States, 19 Cust. Ct. 309, Reap. Dec. 7438, and that the record in Reap. Dec. 7712, supra, may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that the attempted appraisement embodied in the second return of value by the appraiser of the merchandise covered by this appeal was illegal, null, and void, and that the appraiser’s original return of value, as reported by him to the collector of customs, constituted his appraisal of the merchandise pursuant to section 500 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1500), and was final and conclusive in the absence of any appeal pursuant to section 501 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1501).

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Cust. Ct. 379, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuri-v-united-states-cusc-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack