Kuravskaya v. Samjo Realty Corp.

281 A.D.2d 518, 721 N.Y.S.2d 836, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2626
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 19, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 281 A.D.2d 518 (Kuravskaya v. Samjo Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kuravskaya v. Samjo Realty Corp., 281 A.D.2d 518, 721 N.Y.S.2d 836, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2626 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), entered January 3, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against her, dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff was found unconscious at the bottom of a flight of stairs in the defendant’s apartment building, bleeding from a head injury. As a result of the injuries she suffered in the accident, the plaintiff was left in a permanent vegetative state and was thus unable to testify. There were no witnesses to the accident.

The Supreme Court did not err in denying the plaintiffs request for a so-called “Noseworthy” charge (see, Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76). The parties were on an equal footing as to their access to knowledge of the events which caused the plaintiffs injuries. Under such circumstances, there is no basis for the requested charge (see, Gayle v City of New York, 256 AD2d 541; see also, Orloski v McCarthy, 274 AD2d 633).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grande v. Won Hee Lee
2019 NY Slip Op 2685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Tyrell v. Pollak
2018 NY Slip Op 5251 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Knudsen v. Mamaroneck Post No. 90
94 A.D.3d 1058 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Miles v. County of Dutchess
85 A.D.3d 878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Zalot v. Zieba
81 A.D.3d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Aguilar v. Anthony
80 A.D.3d 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Martone v. Shields
71 A.D.3d 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Jarvis v. LaFarge North America, Inc.
52 A.D.3d 1179 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Durkin v. Long Island Power Authority
37 A.D.3d 400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D.2d 518, 721 N.Y.S.2d 836, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuravskaya-v-samjo-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2001.