Kuratnik v. Illinois Steel Co.

146 N.E. 216, 82 Ind. App. 366, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 224
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided January 9, 1925·No. No. 12,093.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant lives, and has always lived, in Russia. Her husband was injured while in the course of his employment with appellee which' injury resulted in his death. Attorneys, claiming to represent her, filed with the Industrial Board an application on her behalf for compensation for herself and her minor daughter. After hearing evidence, the Industrial Board suspended further proceedings until the attorneys should prove their authority, to appear for appellant. This the attorneys declined to do, and appeal from said order of suspension.

There is no provision in the statute for an appeal from the Industrial Board except from a final award. Even if appellant was entitled to proceed without proof of authority, which we do not decide, she has mistaken her remedy.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kuratnik v. Illinois Steel Co., 146 N.E. 216, 82 Ind. App. 366, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 224 (Ind. Ct. App. 1925).

146 N.E. 216 (Kuratnik v. Illinois Steel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Speedway, LLC v. Kendall Shedd
Indiana Court of Appeals, 2025
Cox v. Worker's Compensation Board of Indiana
675 N.E.2d 1053 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1996)
Delaware MacHinery & Tool Company v. Yates
301 N.E.2d 857 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1973)
Knox Consolidated Coal Corp. v. Onions
53 N.E.2d 643 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1944)
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Torrez
174 N.E. 296 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1931)
Kuratnik v. Illinois Steel Company
165 N.E. 924 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1929)
D'Agostino v. General, Etc., Car Corp.
146 N.E. 216 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1925)