Kurach v. Truck Ins. Exch.

211 A.3d 1252
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 29, 2019
DocketNo. 531 EAL 2018; No. 532 EAL 2018
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 211 A.3d 1252 (Kurach v. Truck Ins. Exch.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kurach v. Truck Ins. Exch., 211 A.3d 1252 (Pa. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the limitation of payment of General Contractors Overhead and Profit from actual cash value in a replacement cost policy, although violative of binding precedent, was nonetheless valid and enforceable?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kurach, K., Aplt. v. Truck Ins. Exchange
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2020
Wintersteen, M., Aplt. v. Truck Ins. Exchange
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 A.3d 1252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurach-v-truck-ins-exch-pa-2019.