Kurach v. Truck Ins. Exch.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Kurach v. Truck Ins. Exch.

211 A.3d 1252

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 29, 2019·No. No. 531 EAL 2018; No. 532 EAL 2018·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the limitation of payment of General Contractors Overhead and Profit from actual cash value in a replacement cost policy, although violative of binding precedent, was nonetheless valid and enforceable?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the limitation of payment of General Contractors Overhead and Profit from actual cash value in a replacement cost policy, although violative of binding precedent, was nonetheless valid and enforceable?

Kurach v. Truck Ins. Exch., 211 A.3d 1252 (Pa. 2019).

Pincite

211 A.3d 1252 (Kurach v. Truck Ins. Exch.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related