Kurach, K. v. Truck Insurance Exchange
This text of Kurach, K. v. Truck Insurance Exchange (Kurach, K. v. Truck Insurance Exchange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
KONRAD KURACH, : No. 531 EAL 2018 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, : : Respondent :
MARK WINTERSTEEN, INDIVIDUALLY : No. 532 EAL 2018 AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS : SIMILARLY SITUATED : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the limitation of payment of General Contractors Overhead and Profit from actual cash value in a replacement cost policy, although violative of binding precedent, was nonetheless valid and enforceable?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kurach, K. v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurach-k-v-truck-insurance-exchange-pa-2019.