Kurach, K. v. Truck Insurance Exchange
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
KONRAD KURACH, : No. 531 EAL 2018 :
Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : :
TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, : :
Respondent :
MARK WINTERSTEEN, INDIVIDUALLY : No. 532 EAL 2018 AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS : SIMILARLY SITUATED : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : :
TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, : :
Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the limitation of payment of General Contractors Overhead and Profit from actual cash value in a replacement cost policy, although violative of binding precedent, was nonetheless valid and enforceable?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kurach, K. v. Truck Insurance Exchange (Kurach, K. v. Truck Insurance Exchange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.