Kurach, K. v. Truck Insurance Exchange

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 29, 2019·No. 531 EAL 2018 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

KONRAD KURACH, : No. 531 EAL 2018 :

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : :

TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, : :

Respondent :

MARK WINTERSTEEN, INDIVIDUALLY : No. 532 EAL 2018 AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS : SIMILARLY SITUATED : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : :

TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, : :

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the limitation of payment of General Contractors Overhead and Profit from actual cash value in a replacement cost policy, although violative of binding precedent, was nonetheless valid and enforceable?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kurach, K. v. Truck Insurance Exchange, (Pa. 2019).

Kurach, K. v. Truck Insurance Exchange (Kurach, K. v. Truck Insurance Exchange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.