Kuppersmith v. Dowling

702 N.E.2d 838, 92 N.Y.2d 914, 680 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 3077
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kuppersmith v. Dowling. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 N.Y.2d 90
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 17, 1998·Published

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of appellants’ motion for a preliminary injunction, dismissed upon the ground that such part of the Appellate Division order does not [915]*915finally determine the action/proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kuppersmith v. Dowling, 702 N.E.2d 838, 92 N.Y.2d 914, 680 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 3077 (N.Y. 1998).

702 N.E.2d 838 (Kuppersmith v. Dowling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.