Kupferman v. Katz
194 N.E.2d 47, 13 N.Y.2d 932
This text of 194 N.E.2d 47 (Kupferman v. Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kupferman v. Katz, 194 N.E.2d 47, 13 N.Y.2d 932 (N.Y. 1963).
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs. The Appellate Division acted within its discretionary power in affirming the denial of the [934]*934petition in this mandamus proceeding because of delay in bringing it. We reach no other question. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Foster and Scileppi.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Matter of Futia v. Town of N. Castle
2020 NY Slip Op 4476 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Woodburn v. Village of Owego
2017 NY Slip Op 4513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Fossella v. Dinkins
130 Misc. 2d 52 (New York Supreme Court, 1985)
Greene v. Town Board of Warrensburg
90 A.D.2d 916 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Brucia v. County of Suffolk
90 A.D.2d 762 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Opn. No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 1979
Barr v. City of Syracuse
97 Misc. 2d 453 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
194 N.E.2d 47, 13 N.Y.2d 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kupferman-v-katz-ny-1963.