KUOL v. State
323 S.W.3d 99, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1462, 2010 WL 4175600
Opinion
Order
Appellant, James A. Kuol, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing in the Circuit Court of Clay County. Kuol argues that his plea counsel was constitutionally ineffective. We disagree and affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties a memorandum of law explaining our ruling today. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
KUOL v. State, 323 S.W.3d 99, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1462, 2010 WL 4175600 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
323 S.W.3d 99 (KUOL v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Carter
323 S.W.3d 99 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)