Kuo, Tien Jung v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 9, 2012·No. 05-11-01268-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered October , 2012

In The Court of appeato jriftb IlDi5stritt of Texass at /Dams No. 05-11-01268-CR No. 05-11-01269-CR

TIEN JUNG KUO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-55962-J, F10-55963-J

ORDER The Court REINSTATES the appeals.

On September 18, 2012, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the

reporter's record has not been filed. On October 4, 2012, we received appellant's motions to

dismiss the appeals, signed by both appellant and his attorney. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

Accordingly, we conclude findings are no longer necessary and VACATE the September 18,

2012 order.

We DENY appellant's January 7, 2012 motions to dismiss because they were not signed

by both appellant and counsel. We will dispose of appellant's October 4, 2012 motions to dismiss the appeals in due

course.

15AVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kuo, Tien Jung v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Kuo, Tien Jung v. State (Kuo, Tien Jung v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.