Kunzie v. Kunzie

Nebraska Supreme Court

Kunzie v. Kunzie

401 N.W.2d 164, 224 Neb. 756, 1987 Neb. LEXIS 807

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided February 20, 1987·No. No. 85-598·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner wife, Betty Marie Kunzie, appeals from the decree dissolving her marriage to the respondent husband, Edward George Kunzie, on the bases that the trial court erred in its property division, in failing to award alimony, and in the amount of the attorney fee awarded to her. Having reviewed the record de novo as we are required to do, we conclude that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in any regard.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petitioner wife, Betty Marie Kunzie, appeals from the decree dissolving her marriage to the respondent husband, Edward George Kunzie, on the bases that the trial court erred in its property division, in failing to award alimony, and in the amount of the attorney fee awarded to her. Having reviewed the record de novo as we are required to do, we conclude that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in any regard.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Kunzie v. Kunzie, 401 N.W.2d 164, 224 Neb. 756, 1987 Neb. LEXIS 807 (Neb. 1987).

Pincite

401 N.W.2d 164 (Kunzie v. Kunzie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.