Kunze v. Kunze

New York Supreme Court

Kunze v. Kunze

53 N.Y.S. 938

DecidedMarch 16, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 53 N.Y.S. 938 (Kunze v. Kunze) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kunze v. Kunze, 53 N.Y.S. 938 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

DALY, J.

Motion to modify order for alimony and counsel fee on the ground that since the making of the order the plaintiff has lost Ms situation through the efforts of the defendant, his wife, and has since been unable to obtain permanent employment. The motion cannot be granted. So far as the counsel fee is concerned, the husband, having commenced the action, is bound to furnish his wife the means to defend it, and, if he continues the prosecution, he must pay her counsel fee. As to the alimony, it' was fixed at what was a reasonable rate, in view of the condition of the parties, and no modification is necessary. The facts now urged by plaintiff may be a good defense to any attempt by his wife to enforce payment by contempt proceedings of installments accruing while he is disabled by her act from earning money. When he is again in a position to acquire the means to pay, the order will be enforced, and should accordingly stand, so as to apply to future earnings.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DALY, J.

Motion to modify order for alimony and counsel fee on the ground that since the making of the order the plaintiff has lost Ms situation through the efforts of the defendant, his wife, and has since been unable to obtain permanent employment. The motion cannot be granted. So far as the counsel fee is concerned, the husband, having commenced the action, is bound to furnish his wife the means to defend it, and, if he continues the prosecution, he must pay her counsel fee. As to the alimony, it' was fixed at what was a reasonable rate, in view of the condition of the parties, and no modification is necessary. The facts now urged by plaintiff may be a good defense to any attempt by his wife to enforce payment by contempt proceedings of installments accruing while he is disabled by her act from earning money. When he is again in a position to acquire the means to pay, the order will be enforced, and should accordingly stand, so as to apply to future earnings.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 N.Y.S. 938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kunze-v-kunze-nysupct-1898.