Kunz v. Mason

73 A. 869, 75 N.J. Eq. 616, 5 Buchanan 616, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 301
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 14, 1909
StatusPublished

This text of 73 A. 869 (Kunz v. Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kunz v. Mason, 73 A. 869, 75 N.J. Eq. 616, 5 Buchanan 616, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 301 (N.J. 1909).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Learning, delivered in the court below.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Eeed, Trenoi-iard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill, Congdon—15. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 A. 869, 75 N.J. Eq. 616, 5 Buchanan 616, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kunz-v-mason-nj-1909.