Kuntz v. Lloyds Casualty Co.
This text of 234 A.D. 728 (Kuntz v. Lloyds Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the witnesses sought to be examined have no personal knowledge bearing upon the issue of whether the accident was caused by any elevator, moving platform or hoisting device, and the testimony sought to be obtained can have no bearing upon any issue in the case, as the contract of insurance is definite and certain as to coverage, and there can be, on the. record before us, no extension of such coverage by waiver or estoppel. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 A.D. 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuntz-v-lloyds-casualty-co-nyappdiv-1931.