Kuntz v. Lake Placid Olympic Organizing Committee of 1980, Inc.

148 Misc. 2d 649, 561 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1990 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 531
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 3, 1990·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph Harris, J.

Defendant, New York Telephone Company, moves for dismissal of plaintiffs’ action, pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b), for plaintiffs’ failure to serve a complaint on demand.

Plaintiffs commenced the instant action, seeking damages for breach of contract, breach of implied contract, restraint of trade and commerce, and R.I.C.O., by service of a summons on defendant New York Telephone Company on April 4,1990. On April 20, 1990, defendant served plaintiffs with a demand for a complaint. Despite further inquiries by the defendant, plaintiffs have failed to serve a complaint in compliance with defendant’s demand.

Plaintiffs contend that they are not obligated to serve a complaint in that defendant is precluded from moving to [650]*650dismiss plaintiffs’ action by the automatic stay in bankruptcy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kuntz v. Lake Placid Olympic Organizing Committee of 1980, Inc., 148 Misc. 2d 649, 561 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1990 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 531 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1990).

148 Misc. 2d 649 (Kuntz v. Lake Placid Olympic Organizing Committee of 1980, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shah v. Glendale Federal Bank
44 Cal. App. 4th 1371 (California Court of Appeal, 1996)