Kunstler v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Kunstler v. United States

61 Cust. Ct. 645, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1765

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 3, 1968

DocketNo. P68/380; protest 66/76292 (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 61 Cust. Ct. 645 (Kunstler v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kunstler v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 645, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1765 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of certain diamond gemstones, cut and polished in the United States, exported without benefit of drawback, and returned without having been advanced in value or improved in condition, and that the applicable customs regulations have been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Bertrand Freres, Inc., et al. v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 155, C.D. 2296).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of certain diamond gemstones, cut and polished in the United States, exported without benefit of drawback, and returned without having been advanced in value or improved in condition, and that the applicable customs regulations have been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Bertrand Freres, Inc., et al. v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 155, C.D. 2296).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Cust. Ct. 645, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kunstler-v-united-states-cusc-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack