Kunst v. Loree

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedNovember 20, 2019
Docket27929
StatusPublished

This text of Kunst v. Loree (Kunst v. Loree) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kunst v. Loree, (S.C. 2019).

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

J. Scott Kunst, Respondent,

v.

David Loree, Petitioner.

Appellate Case No. 2018-001700

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal from Pickens County Robin B. Stilwell, Circuit Court Judge

Opinion No. 27929 Submitted October 15, 2019 – Filed November 20, 2019

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Violet Elizabeth Wright, of V. Elizabeth Wright Law Firm LLC, of Greenville, and Gregory K. Smith, of Smith, Gambrell & Russell, of Atlanta, Georgia, for Petitioner.

J. Scott Kunst, pro se, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Kunst v. Loree, 424 S.C. 24, 817 S.E.2d 295 (Ct. App. 2018). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kunst v. Loree
817 S.E.2d 295 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kunst v. Loree, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kunst-v-loree-sc-2019.