Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Kunst v. Kunst

Kunst v. Kunst

551 So. 2d 522, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2134, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5027, 1989 WL 104056
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 5, 1989
DocketNo. 88-2226
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 551 So. 2d 522 (Kunst v. Kunst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kunst v. Kunst, 551 So. 2d 522, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2134, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5027, 1989 WL 104056 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order determining custody was supported by substantial, competent evidence. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm. Richardson v. Richardson, 442 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). This affirmance is without prejudice to either party’s right to return to the trial court to seek partition of the jointly owned real property, or to have the trial court determine each party’s financial responsibility for expenses and entitlement to profits relating to that property.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brago v. Brago
604 So. 2d 866 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Underwood v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV.
551 So. 2d 522 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
551 So. 2d 522, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2134, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5027, 1989 WL 104056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kunst-v-kunst-fladistctapp-1989.